Which document this is
New Mexico has no document of its own called a living will. What it recognizes is the Advance Health-Care Directive, created under the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act, NMSA 1978 §§ 24-7A-1 to 24-7A-18. It is a single document with three parts: Part 1 is a power of attorney naming your agent, the person who makes health care decisions for you once you cannot; Part 2 carries your own instructions about the treatment you do and do not want; Part 3 lets you name your primary care practitioner, the clinician with primary responsibility for your care. Where many states split the agent appointment and the instructions into two separate documents, New Mexico’s Act keeps both in one.
Using New Mexico’s own printed form is optional. The form itself says so in its opening line: each paragraph and word of the form is optional, you may cross out, complete, or modify any part of it, and you are free to use a different form altogether. What the Act does require is a written document, signed by you.
The third part, naming your primary care practitioner, is easy to skip and worth doing anyway. It gives a hospital a name to call first when your directive needs to be located and read, rather than leaving that job to whoever happens to be on duty. Nothing in the Act makes this part mandatory, and a directive without it is still valid; it simply does one less thing for you.
This is the same shape as Myend’s free Healthcare Directive: your instructions and your agent gathered into one document, ready to sign.
Who can make one
New Mexico asks that you be an adult, eighteen or older, to execute an Advance Health-Care Directive as your own principal. The Act widens that slightly for an emancipated minor: someone between sixteen and eighteen who has been married, who is on active duty in the armed forces, or who has been declared emancipated by court order can also sign one. Either way you have to have capacity at the moment you sign, and the Act defines that word: the ability to understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of proposed health care, including its significant benefits, risks and alternatives, and to make and communicate an informed health care decision. You are presumed to have it, and choosing to turn down the treatment a clinician recommends is never on its own a reason to say you lack it.
There is no requirement to sign a directive alongside a will or any other planning document. Some people do both at once; New Mexico’s Act does not ask for that, and a directive signed entirely on its own carries exactly the same weight.
Signing it so it counts
New Mexico is one of the very few states that asks for neither a witness nor a notary. The statute’s execution rule is short: your power of attorney for health care must be in writing and signed by you. That is the whole requirement for naming your agent, and for the treatment instructions you write into the same document.
The Act is looser again about instructions standing on their own. An individual instruction may be oral or written, and an oral one is valid only if you give it by personally informing a health care provider. That is a fallback the Act recognizes rather than a substitute for signing something, and it counts only if the right person heard it.
- 1You sign
You sign and date your Advance Health-Care Directive. That is the entire statutory requirement, whether you use New Mexico’s optional form or write your own.
- 2Witnesses are optional, not required
New Mexico’s own form is direct about this: it is recommended but not required that you ask two other people to sign as witnesses. Nothing in the Act sets a rule for who may serve, because witnessing was never made a legal requirement to begin with.
- 3No notary, either
The word notary does not appear anywhere in the Act’s eighteen sections, and the optional form has no notary block. There is no alternative path through notarization the way some states offer.
New Mexico’s own recommendation is worth following even though the law does not require it. New Mexico honors a directive signed correctly in another state, but a state that requires its own witnesses may not extend the same courtesy to a New Mexico directive that has none. Adding two witnesses costs a few minutes and closes that gap.
Naming your agent
Part 1 of your Advance Health-Care Directive is where you name your agent, the person authorized to make health care decisions for you once you cannot make them yourself. New Mexico’s Act sets one restriction: an owner, operator, or employee of the health care institution where you are receiving care cannot serve as your agent, unless that person is related to you by blood, marriage, or adoption. Outside that single rule, the Act does not narrow who you can choose.
Choosing carefully still matters even where the law leaves the choice open. Your agent is the person who will be asked, sometimes on short notice, to interpret your written instructions and speak for you when you cannot. Picking someone who knows your wishes and is willing to act on them, rather than simply the first available relative, is a decision the statute leaves entirely to you.
When it takes effect
Unless your directive says otherwise, your agent’s authority becomes effective only once a determination is made that you lack the capacity to make your own health care decisions. Absent contrary language in your directive, that determination is made by two qualified health care professionals, one of whom is your primary care practitioner. New Mexico’s optional form phrases that same requirement as “my primary care practitioner and one other qualified health-care professional.” The Act used to say primary physician; a 2015 amendment widened it, so a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, psychologist, nurse or social worker can be the qualified professional making the call. Where the lack of capacity is found to exist because of mental illness or developmental disability, one of the two has to be a person whose training and expertise aid in assessing functional impairment. You can instead choose, in the document itself, to have your agent’s authority start immediately rather than waiting on that determination, and the authority ends again on a determination that you have recovered capacity.
If you are pregnant
New Mexico’s Act does not mention pregnancy anywhere across its eighteen sections. There is no clause that suspends your directive, no condition that switches on if a physician learns you are pregnant, and no paragraph on the state’s own optional form addressing it either. Your Advance Health-Care Directive applies exactly as you wrote it, whether or not you are pregnant.
Changing or cancelling it
New Mexico separates revoking your agent’s designation from revoking the rest of the directive. You can revoke your agent’s designation with a signed writing, or by personally telling your supervising health care provider; if you are unable to sign, that written revocation must itself be witnessed by two people signing in each other’s and your presence. Everything else in the directive, your instructions and any other part, can be revoked at any time in any manner that communicates your intent to revoke, with no particular form required.
Two more rules are worth knowing. A later directive revokes an earlier one wherever the two conflict. And filing for or a decree of annulment, divorce, dissolution, or legal separation revokes a spouse’s designation as your agent, unless your directive or the decree says otherwise, and is revived if you remarry the same person or the divorce is later nullified.
Making sure it is found
New Mexico does not appear to run a state directive registry; its Act contains no registry provision. The practical route here is to hand your Advance Health-Care Directive directly to the people who would need it. Give a copy to your agent, your primary care practitioner, and the hospital you are most likely to use, and keep the signed original somewhere your family knows to look. A copy that sits in a drawer at home does nothing for you in an emergency room; a copy in your physician’s file, or in your agent’s hands, is the one that actually gets read.
New Mexico’s Act also addresses directives signed elsewhere: a directive validly executed in another state or jurisdiction, in compliance with that place’s own laws, is deemed valid and enforceable in New Mexico to the same extent as if it had been made here.
This is not a POLST
New Mexico’s medical orders program is generally known as New Mexico Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment, or NM MOST. It is a different kind of document from your Advance Health-Care Directive. A MOST form is a set of specific medical orders that a clinician signs together with someone already facing a serious illness, meant to travel with that person between hospital, nursing facility, home, and ambulance. Your Advance Health-Care Directive is something you complete in advance, for a future you cannot yet see. Myend prepares the Advance Health-Care Directive. It does not, and cannot, produce a MOST form, because that has to come from a treating clinician.
What is different about New Mexico
New Mexico asks for one thing: your signature. Everything else, witnesses included, is your own choice.
New Mexico sits at the light end of every state’s execution rule. No witness, no notary, just a written document signed by you. The state’s own form goes out of its way to say so twice: using the form at all is optional, and asking two people to witness your signature is recommended but not required. Most states build a ceremony around signing an Advance Health-Care Directive; New Mexico builds almost none.
The Act is just as quiet on pregnancy. Across all eighteen of its sections, the word pregnant does not appear once. States that address pregnancy usually suspend a directive automatically or ask you to choose in the form itself; New Mexico does neither, because it never raises the question.
New Mexico also folds what other states split into two documents, the agent appointment and the treatment instructions, into a single Advance Health-Care Directive with a third part for naming your primary care practitioner. And unlike states that run a dedicated directive registry, New Mexico’s Act sets up none, leaving copies in the hands of the people who would actually need them as the only way to make sure your directive is found.
One more feature of the Act is worth naming: its emancipated-minor provision. A person as young as sixteen who has been married, is on active duty in the armed forces, or has been declared emancipated by court order can execute an Advance Health-Care Directive here, a broader group than the flat eighteen-and-older line most states draw.
Common questions
Does New Mexico require notarization for an Advance Health-Care Directive?
How many witnesses does New Mexico require?
What is the difference between a living will and New Mexico's Advance Health-Care Directive?
Who can I name as my agent in New Mexico, and who cannot serve?
Is New Mexico's Advance Health-Care Directive the same as NM MOST?
Does my New Mexico directive still count if I am treated in another state?
Can I change or cancel my New Mexico directive?
Do I need a lawyer to complete an advance directive in New Mexico?
Sources and review
Legal sources
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-17 (short title)The Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act, the law behind New Mexico's Advance Health-Care Directive
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-2, § 24-7A-4The Advance Health-Care Directive's structure: one combined document naming an agent and recording instructions
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-4The state's optional form, and its own note that using it, or any part of it, is never required
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-1(D), (P)Who may sign: a principal is an adult or an emancipated minor, someone between sixteen and eighteen who has been married, is on active duty in the armed forces, or has been declared emancipated by court order
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-1(C); § 24-7A-11(B), (D)What capacity means, that you are presumed to have it, and that refusing recommended treatment is not evidence you lack it
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-2(B); § 24-7A-4Signing requirement: your own written signature, with no witness requirement stated
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-2(A)An individual instruction may be oral or written, and an oral one is valid only if made by personally informing a health-care provider
- NMSA 1978 §§ 24-7A-1 through 24-7A-18Full-text review of the entire Act: no notarization requirement anywhere, and pregnancy is never mentioned
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-1(B)The term agent, for the person you name to make health care decisions for you
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-2(B)Who cannot serve as your agent: an owner, operator, or employee of the facility treating you, unless related to you
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-2(C)-(D), § 24-7A-11(C)When your agent's authority takes effect and ends: two qualified health-care professionals, one of them your primary care practitioner, and the extra requirement where the lack of capacity rests on mental illness or developmental disability
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-3How to revoke a directive or an agent designation
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-16(C)Reciprocity: a directive validly signed in another state is honored in New Mexico
- NMSA 1978 § 24-7A-16(B), (C)Where the Act uses the phrase living will: older documents and documents signed in other states
- NM Dept. of HealthThe name of New Mexico's medical orders program, NM MOST
Read from primary statutes, September 2026. General information, not legal or medical advice.